Written by:
Kyle Kaan
Overview:
“It is very important to evaluate the benefits of the training and be
able to put that in terms of numbers. Training comes at a cost and therefore
any organization would be interested in knowing the return on investment (ROI).”
(Cost Benefit Analysis for Training)
Relevance:
Cost analysis of on the job training is crucial for upper management in
order to make the best decisions for the organization. If the training program
does not provide sufficient financial benefit to the organization it will be
management’s responsibility to decide whether or not to continue with the
training. However, in almost all cases, HR training programs provide a positive
return on investment and are a critical investment to improve the operations of
the organization.
Key
Points:
Training
employees is not cheap, so organizations should be interested in knowing the
return on investment. The return on investment formula is as follows: Return on
Investment (in percent) = Program benefits/Costs x 100. This formula demonstrates
how successful the training program is in terms of how much capital was spent
on the training and how the performance of the employees increased after the
training was complete.
The costs
associated with the return on investment formula are relatively easy to
calculate in comparison with the program benefits. The basic training costs can
usually be broken down into two broad categories: course development and
training execution (this is easy to calculate when using an external company
because they will give a set amount for any given program). The in house
training costs can be broken down into smaller categories: designing structure
based on learning objectives, designing training materials, preparing pre
course material, preparing course hand outs, preparing evaluation tools,
travelling expenses, and refreshments for the trainee’s.
There are
other costs associated with human capital in regards to the trainers. The
organization must consider the hours that the mentor will not be able to carry
out their normal duties. The trainer will not have time to carry out their regular
tasks within the organization, so someone else within the organization will
have to complete the trainer’s assigned tasks during their absence. Or the
mentor will have to work overtime, which costs the company more, and the
overtime costs should be recorded in association with the training costs. There
will also be costs in regards to the trainee’s time and the administration and
management costs.
The program
benefits are more difficult to calculate. “The HRD staff should collect both
hard data (representing output, quality, cost, and time) and soft data
(including work habits, work climate, and attitudes)” (Shaw). The benefits can
be measured using various metrics: follow-up questionnaires, program
assignments, action plans, performance contracts, and performance monitoring. All
of these metrics require a collection of data before and after the training is
complete. “The important challenge in this step is to select the data
collection method or methods that are appropriate for both the setting and the
specific program” (Shaw).
Theory:
As per the textbook “A widely used financial measure that can be applied
to measure the contribution and cost of HR activities is return on investment,
which is a calculation showing the value of investments in human resources.
Return on investment is stressed because it is used in most other functions in
an organization and is the language used by financial staff and top management.”
(Mathis - HRM textbook p.65)
Take Away
Points:
All
activities performed within the organization have costs associated with them.
The role of management is to determine whether or not these activities are
worthwhile. Return on investment and other various cost analysis metrics are
necessary for every aspect of business, including HR training programs. It is
essential to determine whether the job training is going to be a financial
benefit to the organization and will help the company grow financially. The
return on investment analysis will also determine if it is more beneficial to
outsource the HR training programs or keep them in house.
Works
Cited:
"Cost
Benefit Analysis for Training." Managementstudyguide.com. N.p., n.d.
Web. 31 Mar. 2013. <http://www.managementstudyguide.com/cost-benefit-analysis-for-training.htm>.
Cotterill,
Rob. "Best Practice Guidance on Training for Small and Medium Sized
Enterprises." Epsc.org. N.p., May 2004. Web. 31 Mar. 2013.
<http://www.epsc.org/data/files/PRISM/Training%20Guidance%20Rev%201.pdf>.
Shaw, Jack.
"Evaluating Training and Results (ROI of Training)." Evaluating
Training and Results (ROI of Training). Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity
Consulting, LLC., n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2013.
<http://managementhelp.org/training/systematic/ROI-evaluating-training.htm>.
Mathis,
Robert L., and John Harold. Jackson. Human Resource Management. 13th ed.
Mason, OH: Thomson/South-western, 2011. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment